The calculation of sec->ckpt_valid_blocks are the same in both
set_ckpt_valid_blocks() and sanity_check_valid_blocks(), so it
doesn't necessary to call sanity_check_valid_blocks() right after
set_ckpt_valid_blocks().

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 1ef4edb77078..f9c688d270e6 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -4802,10 +4802,8 @@ void f2fs_flush_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
struct cp_control *cpc)
                        }
 
                        /* update ckpt_valid_block */
-                       if (__is_large_section(sbi)) {
+                       if (__is_large_section(sbi))
                                set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);
-                               sanity_check_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);
-                       }
 
                        __clear_bit(segno, bitmap);
                        sit_i->dirty_sentries--;
@@ -5133,10 +5131,8 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
        if (__is_large_section(sbi)) {
                unsigned int segno;
 
-               for (segno = 0; segno < MAIN_SEGS(sbi); segno += 
SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi)) {
+               for (segno = 0; segno < MAIN_SEGS(sbi); segno += 
SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi))
                        set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);
-                       sanity_check_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);
-               }
        }
 
        if (err)
-- 
2.49.0



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to