On 6/17/26 08:39, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/21, Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
>> fsck.f2fs -d1 <device>
>>
>> [fix_section_type:3036] wrong sit->type (4) in DATA secno:1 segno:2
>> [fix_section_type:3036] wrong sit->type (4) in DATA secno:5 segno:11
>>
>> fsck.f2fs -f <device>
>>
>> [FIX] (fix_section_type:3040)  --> Fix wrong sit->type (4 -> 2) in DATA 
>> secno (1), segno (2)
>> [FIX] (fix_section_type:3050)  --> Fix wrong sit->type in DATA secno (1), 
>> totally 1 empty segment(s)
>> [FIX] (fix_section_type:3040)  --> Fix wrong sit->type (4 -> 2) in DATA 
>> secno (5), segno (11)
>> [FIX] (fix_section_type:3050)  --> Fix wrong sit->type in DATA secno (5), 
>> totally 1 empty segment(s)
>>
>> Now it can only fix wrong sit->type of segment from NODE to DATA in a DATA
>> section, such inconsistent image can be generated by recovery.
>>
>> For fuzzed image which contains below inconsistent sit->type, we can support
>> to detect and repair later:
>> 1) empty NODE segment in DATA section (FIXED w/ current patch)
>> 2) empty DATA segment in NODE section
>> 3) valid segments w/ different temperature in DATA section
>> 4) valid segments w/ different temperature in NODE section
>> 5) valid segments w/ different sit->type in section
>>
>> Cc: Daeho Jeong <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - fix printed log
>>  fsck/f2fs.h | 13 ++++++++
>>  fsck/fsck.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fsck/f2fs.h b/fsck/f2fs.h
>> index 5e7eb63..e4e5d0c 100644
>> --- a/fsck/f2fs.h
>> +++ b/fsck/f2fs.h
>> @@ -572,6 +572,19 @@ static inline int IS_CUR_SEGNO(struct f2fs_sb_info 
>> *sbi, u32 segno)
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline int IS_CUR_SECNO(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, u32 secno)
>> +{
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < NO_CHECK_TYPE; i++) {
>> +            struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, i);
>> +
>> +            if (secno == GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, curseg->segno))
>> +                    return 1;
>> +    }
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static inline u64 BLKOFF_FROM_MAIN(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, u64 blk_addr)
>>  {
>>      ASSERT(blk_addr >= SM_I(sbi)->main_blkaddr);
>> diff --git a/fsck/fsck.c b/fsck/fsck.c
>> index 1230d7b..4fca4dd 100644
>> --- a/fsck/fsck.c
>> +++ b/fsck/fsck.c
>> @@ -3012,6 +3012,97 @@ int check_sit_types(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>      }
>>      return err;
>>  }
>> +enum type_fix   {
>> +    TYPE_DATA,              /* fix sit->type of empty node segment to data 
>> */
>> +    TYPE_NODE,              /* fix sit->type of empty data segment to node 
>> */
>> +    TYPE_DATA_TEMP,         /* fix inconsistent sit->type temperature of 
>> data segment */
>> +    TYPE_NODE_TEMP,         /* fix inconsistent sit->type temperature of 
>> node segment */
>> +    TYPE_MIGRATE,           /* migrate node segments in mixed section */
>> +};
>> +static bool fix_section_type(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int secno,
>> +                            unsigned char type, enum type_fix type_fix)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int segno = secno * sbi->segs_per_sec;
>> +    unsigned int end_segno = segno + sbi->segs_per_sec;
>> +    unsigned int empty = 0;
>> +    bool fixed = false;
>> +
>> +    for (; segno < end_segno; segno++) {
>> +            struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
>> +
>> +            if (type_fix == TYPE_DATA) {
>> +                    if (se->valid_blocks)
>> +                            continue;
>> +                    DBG(1, "wrong sit->type (%d) in DATA secno:%d 
>> segno:%d\n",
>> +                            se->type, secno, segno);
>> +                    if (!c.fix_on)
>> +                            continue;
>> +                    FIX_MSG("Fix wrong sit->type (%d -> %d) in DATA secno 
>> (%u), segno (%d)",
>> +                            se->type, type, secno, segno);
>> +                    se->type = type;
>> +                    empty++;
>> +                    fixed = true;
>> +                    continue;
>> +            }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (fixed && type_fix == TYPE_DATA)
>> +            FIX_MSG("Fix wrong sit->type in DATA secno (%u), totally %d 
>> empty segment(s)",
>> +                    secno, empty);
>> +
>> +    return fixed;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool check_large_section_types(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int secno;
>> +    bool fixed = false;
>> +
>> +    if (sbi->segs_per_sec <= 1)
>> +            return 0;
>> +
>> +    for (secno = 0; secno < sbi->total_sections; secno++) {
>> +            struct seg_entry *se;
>> +            unsigned int segno = secno * sbi->segs_per_sec;
>> +            unsigned int end_segno = segno + sbi->segs_per_sec;
>> +            unsigned short data_seg = 0;
>> +            unsigned short node_seg = 0;
>> +            unsigned short empty_data_seg = 0;
>> +            unsigned short empty_node_seg = 0;
>> +            unsigned char data_type = NO_CHECK_TYPE;
>> +
>> +            if (IS_CUR_SECNO(sbi, secno))
>> +                    continue;
>> +
>> +            for (; segno < end_segno; segno++) {
>> +                    se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
>> +                    if (IS_DATASEG(se->type)) {
>> +                            if (se->valid_blocks) {
>> +                                    data_seg++;
>> +                                    data_type = se->type;
>> +                            } else {
>> +                                    empty_data_seg++;
> 
> Don't we need to check empty_data_seg below?

I guess we need to check empty_data_seg when we start to sanity check & fix
inconsistent case 2) below, now we don't need.

1) empty NODE segment in DATA section (FIXED w/ current patch)
2) empty DATA segment in NODE section
3) valid segments w/ different temperature in DATA section
4) valid segments w/ different temperature in NODE section
5) valid segments w/ different sit->type in section

Let me remove this variable if it causes confusing or compile warning.

Thanks,

> 
>> +                            }
>> +                    } else {
>> +                            if (se->valid_blocks)
>> +                                    node_seg++;
>> +                            else
>> +                                    empty_node_seg++;
>> +                    }
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            /* skip free section */
>> +            if (!data_seg && !node_seg)
>> +                    continue;
>> +
>> +            /* data section, fix sit->type of empty node segment to data */
>> +            if (data_seg && !node_seg && empty_node_seg) {
>> +                    if (fix_section_type(sbi, secno, data_type, TYPE_DATA))
>> +                            fixed = true;
>> +            }
>> +    }
>> +    return fixed;
>> +}
>>  
>>  static struct f2fs_node *fsck_get_lpf(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>  {
>> @@ -3834,6 +3925,9 @@ int fsck_verify(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>      if (check_sit_types(sbi) != 0)
>>              force = 1;
>>  
>> +    if (check_large_section_types(sbi))
>> +            force = 1;
>> +
>>      printf("[FSCK] other corrupted bugs                          ");
>>      if (c.bug_on == 0) {
>>              printf(" [Ok..]\n");
>> -- 
>> 2.49.0
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to