On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:04:15PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > [...] > > > > BTW: > > I expect 2.8.4 to destroy my local setup again since the automated patching > > of fai.conf etc would no longer work :-( and it's little fun to find > > such changes the hard way. > > > If you are willing to track all changes, you could ask Thomas to add your > email > address to his CVS-commit list -- that might help.
Another idea: what about a fai-devel list? (not that I'm a developer myself - I didn't even make it to the workshop at Geilenkirchen, but I'd be willing to follow development a bit more closely, while still too lazy to diff all the stuff myself) Thomas? > > Thanks for helping - if I had stayed with 2.6.x this would not have > > happened (for the old error line would have shown up in error.log, > > who reads the full log files?) > Although 2.6.x would not have led to such (maybe?) strange behaviour, it would > instead not have installed any packages, as the whole load of packages was > then > installed at once and that command would have failed the same way. Sure, but I would have found it at first glance. > http://www.godslayer.org/pics/computers_46.php In the era of cloning (and man trying to to ${DEITY}'s job), this picture merely shows Linux's flexibility :-) Cheers, Steffen
