Hi, On Monday 20 August 2007 15:02, Per Foreby wrote: > Here is an update of the problem description: > > With my extra "aptitude update" in te softupdate hook, the output looks > like this on consecutive softupdates: [...] > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.ddg.lth.se etch Release: The following > signatures were i > nvalid: BADSIG 0FB2A45B5A214303 Datordriftgruppen LTH package signing > key <dpkg@> ddg.lth.se>
Uh.
> The "aptitude update" from my hook fails, but the second run (in
> updatebase) succeds.
>
> This happens on consecutive souftupdates. However, if I run "aptitude
> update" manually, then all errors are gone, and my extra update is
> probably not needed.
Strange.
> So the question is: What's the difference between running the update in
> the fai scripts, and running it on the command line. Caching, ...?
I don't know (without looking at the code), but I'd suggest you file a bug
against fai-client so that we can track and fix the issue.
regards,
Holger
pgpdVHjc1Kfvo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
