On Friday 11 April 2014 10:01:10 Thomas Lange wrote: > A new option "optional" would be nice. But the setup-storage > maintainer is inactive for a longer time, and I'm not sure if anybody > else knows enough about the internal structure to implement such a > feature.
I'm still too afraid to do any non-trivial modification in the original code. Supporting an 'optional' disk sounds like it could get ugly real fast. Still thinking about how to do a proper implementation / improve the code / do a rewrite but I'm finding it hard to allocate time for it. Doesn't really help my company has been bought by someone else and where in the midst of an IT merge. (Nope, not working for Whatsapp/Occulus.)
