Hello Someone provided me with output for a parted v1.8.8 but the flags column looks very strange:
[...] Flags [...] , , , , , , , , , type=82, , [...] boot, , , , , , , , , type=83, , Can somebody else confirm this is really correct? In Volumes.pm for setup- storage 1.5 there's an example for an even older parted 1.7.1 but the Flags column looks like parted 2.x: $ /sbin/parted -s /dev/hda unit B print WARNING: You are not superuser. Watch out for permissions. Disk /dev/hda: 80026361855B Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: mac Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 512B 32767B 32256B primary 5 32768B 1033215B 1000448B hfs primary boot 3 134250496B 32212287487B 32078036992B hfs+ primary 6 32212287488B 46212287487B 14000000000B ext3 primary 2 46212287488B 47212287999B 1000000512B linux-swap primary swap 4 47212288000B 80026361855B 32814073856B ext3 primary Maybe it's kernel-related? Or the above output is actually some other version? Since FAI uses the parted provided by the NFS-root it's probably safe to ignore this oddity. @Thomas L: What do you think about changing 'parted' into 'parted >=2.0' in the package dependencies for fai-setup-storage and ignore parted 1.x? Even Ubuntu 10.04 was shipping with 2.2. bye thomas