Hello, > I believe that it is a better solution to let setup-storage create > btrfs subvolumes in the same order as they occur in the config file > (leaving the responsibility to define a correct order to the user). > Unfortunately, I do not know how to do that.
It seems to me that the problem already occurs in the parser. At least, when setup-storage succeeds with my config file, @root is the first listed btrfs subvolume in the %FAI::configs part of my log file, while one of the other two is listed first when setup-storage fails. Surprisingly, the numbering of the subvolumes is correct in every run of setup-storage; @root has 0, @root/var has 1 und @root/usr has 2. But somehow the order in which the subvolumes are handled by the parser does not follow the numbering order. Does anyone know why this is the case? Regards Christoph
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part