On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 04:54:46PM +0800, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
> For error handling path in ubifs_symlink(), inode will be marked as
> bad first, then iput() is invoked. If inode->i_link is initialized by
> fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() in encryption scenario, inode->i_link won't
> be freed by callchain ubifs_free_inode -> fscrypt_free_inode in error
> handling path, because make_bad_inode() has changed 'inode->i_mode' as
> 'S_IFREG'.
> Following kmemleak is easy to be reproduced by injecting error in
> ubifs_jnl_update() when doing symlink in encryption scenario:
>  unreferenced object 0xffff888103da3d98 (size 8):
>   comm "ln", pid 1692, jiffies 4294914701 (age 12.045s)
>   backtrace:
>    kmemdup+0x32/0x70
>    __fscrypt_encrypt_symlink+0xed/0x1c0
>    ubifs_symlink+0x210/0x300 [ubifs]
>    vfs_symlink+0x216/0x360
>    do_symlinkat+0x11a/0x190
>    do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xe0
> There are two ways fixing it:
>  1. Remove make_bad_inode() in error handling path. We can do that
>     because ubifs_evict_inode() will do same processes for good
>     symlink inode and bad symlink inode, for inode->i_nlink checking
>     is before is_bad_inode().
>  2. Free inode->i_link before marking inode bad.
> Method 2 is picked, it has less influence, personally, I think.
> 
> Cc: [email protected]
> Fixes: 2c58d548f570 ("fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link")
> Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/ubifs/dir.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> index 3b13c648d490..e413a9cf8ee3 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> @@ -1234,6 +1234,8 @@ static int ubifs_symlink(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, 
> struct inode *dir,
>       dir_ui->ui_size = dir->i_size;
>       mutex_unlock(&dir_ui->ui_mutex);
>  out_inode:
> +     /* Free inode->i_link before inode is marked as bad. */
> +     fscrypt_free_inode(inode);
>       make_bad_inode(inode);
>       iput(inode);
>  out_fname:

Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>

- Eric

Reply via email to