On 2025-08-30 21:28:32+0800, Guan-Chun Wu wrote:
> Previously, fscrypt_base64url_encode() processed input one byte at a
> time, using a bitstream, accumulating bits and emitting characters when
> 6 bits were available. This was correct but added extra computation.

Can't the custom base64 implementations in fs/ not pass a custom table
and padding to the generic algorithm in lib/? Then we only need to maintain
this code once.


Thomas

Reply via email to