"Juan J. Quintela" wrote: > > if everybody agrees, here is the patch against test8 using the second > alternative. How about letting the world see it: -static void create_empty_buffers(struct page *page, struct inode *inode, unsigned long blocksize) +void create_empty_buffers(struct page *page, kdev_t dev, unsigned long blocksize) -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Alexander Viro
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Alexander Viro
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Alexander Viro
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Juan J. Quintela
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Juan J. Quintela
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sight... Alexander Viro
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sight... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sight... Chris Mason
- Re: Tailmerging - dragons sight... Chris Mason
