Chris Mason wrote:
> 
> --On 10/03/00 21:13:04 +0200 Daniel Phillips
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Chris Mason wrote:
> >> Heinz Mauelshagen and I have come up with an API for LVM to use
> >> for creating consistent snapshots.  The idea is to block FS modifications
> >> while the snapshot is being created, and to give the FS the chance to
> >> flush everything (including all pending transactions) to disk before
> >> LVM starts doing copy on write.
> > [...]
> >
> >
> > What is the thinking behind having a sync_super sandwich?  I've always
> > wondered about that.
> >
> 
> For filesystems that don't have a write_super_lockfs call back, I wanted to
> make fsync_dev_lockfs == fsync_dev.

I was actually asking why there are two calls to sync_supers, one at the
beginning and one at the end.  That sounds like one too many to me.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to