Hi, On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 02:30:24PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > > Why do you treat attributes differently from files? Why is your interface >specific to attributes > > rather than files generally with attributes being files with a particular name? > > Atomic updates. And for one other reason --- treating them as files wouldn't allow us the ability to do bulk set/get on a number of attributes. That ability gives us a huge reduction in syscalls as well as the atomic guarantees. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Robert Watson
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Andreas Gruenbacher
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Robert Watson
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Daniel Phillips
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Peter J. Braam
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended ... Ragnar Kj�rstad
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix secu... Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix ... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix security ... Hans Reiser
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix secu... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Po... Hans Reiser
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix ... Hans Reiser
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Po... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes fo... Hans Reiser
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Hans Reiser
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Chris Mason
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Hans Reiser
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribut... Stephen C. Tweedie
