-- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 6. Either way, existing binaries cannot handle stat() on 64-bit inode > filesystems. That's not correct. At least it should not be correct if the kernel people have at least a bit of brain. stat() (as opposed to stat64()) should only fail if any of the values which has to be stored cannot fit. Not in general for a 64-bit FS. This significantly reduces the set of programs which are affected. > Ideas, anyone? Again: use LFS. It's easy enough. I have no intention to delay glibc 2.2 even further just because of this. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
