Re: [Acl-Devel] Re: Extended Attributes: Third revised proposal

[Stephen C. Tweedie]

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 11:20:55AM -0800, Peter J. Braam wrote:
> 
> Is there an implied piece of semantics here that with the inode semaphore
> taken,
> one also has a lock on the EA's of that inode?

We could define it that way if we wanted, but I'd have thought that
the inode semaphore would be best left up to the individual filesystem
internals.

--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]