Alexander Viro wrote: > Other that that (and general ugliness of ioctls) - no problems. I > really think that trick I've described would be cleaner, but that's > a separate story. It's not like we had a moratorium on new ioctls, > after all and JFS wouldn't be the first fs to do something like that. > I don't think that it's a good idea, but the worst thing that can > happen is inconvenience for union-mount setups. When union-mount > gets to testable stage, that is - it's not like it was going into the > tree before 2.5, anyway. > > procfs use for per-filesystem stuff is a different issue - that is just > asking for bad breakage. Im a little new in here but after seeing you mention union mount I have to ask, where can I get some more information on union mount, am I correct in thinking that it is some form of overlay filesystem? Regards Angelo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
