On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> people who can afford 2TB of disc can afford to buy a 64-bit processor.
You realise that this'll double the price of storage? ;)
(at least, in a year or two)
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Rik van Riel
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Andreas Dilger
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Dan Hollis
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Ion Badulescu
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit syste... Ion Badulescu
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit ... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-... Ion Badulescu
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit ... LA Walsh
- Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-... Jan Harkes
