On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 15:29, Alex Tomas wrote: > >>>>> Badari Pulavarty (BP) writes: > > >> UP, after: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 > >> real 0m21.452s user 0m0.026s sys 0m6.105s > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 > >> real 0m23.317s user 0m0.027s sys 0m4.206s > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 > >> real 0m25.190s user 0m0.022s sys 0m4.026s > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 > >> real 0m25.024s user 0m0.021s sys 0m4.103s > >> UP, before: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 > >> real 0m19.138s user 0m0.021s sys 0m5.980s > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 > >> real 0m23.123s user 0m0.026s sys 0m4.083s > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 > >> real 0m25.152s user 0m0.017s sys 0m3.836s > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 > >> real 0m25.217s user 0m0.026s sys 0m3.827s > > BP> Hmm.. On UP, the patch made sys.time little worse ? > > grrrr. sorry, that's a typo. exchange 'after' and 'before' please.
Thank you. I was worried for a minute. > btw, want to see how delayed allocation manages this? Sure. I think it will improve the allocation case. Non-allocation case, should be pretty much same, provided I got contiguous layout on the disk. Isn't it ? Thanks, Badari - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
