On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:45:42AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:58:19AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > - there's still some procfs abuse > > > > > > Specifics of what is abuse vs OK would be interesting. > > > > You're using procfs for non-process data. > > I'm not sure I understand this... Looking through /proc I see lots of > subsystems using /proc in similar ways to us. or is there a very specific > method which you have a problem with?
No new subsystems or code shall add /proc files that do not explicitly pertain to process information. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
