On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 11:09 -0700, Marc Eshel wrote: > A cluster filesystem don't need the inode operation breake_lease. The fs > must be able to detect the conflict and break the lease using > __break_lease() call on all the nodes that hold a conflicting leases. > Marc.
Currently, the lease handling is done all in the VFS, and is done prior to calling any filesystem operations. Bruce's break_lease() inode operation allows the VFS to notify the filesystem that some operation is going to be called that requires the lease to be broken. My point is that in doing so, you are not atomic with the operation that requires the lease to be broken. Some different node may re-establish a lease while we're calling back down into the filesystem to perform the operation. So I agree with you. The break_lease() inode operation isn't going to work. The filesystem is going to have to figure out for itself when it needs to notify other nodes that the lease needs breaking, and it needs to figure out its own methods for ensuring atomicity. Cheers Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
