On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 08:51 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > diff -puN
> > fs/namei.c~18-24-sys-mknodat-elevate-write-count-for-vfs-mknod-create
> > fs/namei.c
> > ---
> > lxc/fs/namei.c~18-24-sys-mknodat-elevate-write-count-for-vfs-mknod-create
> > 2007-06-21 23:23:25.000000000 -0700
> > +++ lxc-dave/fs/namei.c 2007-06-21 23:23:25.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -1897,14 +1897,26 @@ asmlinkage long sys_mknodat(int dfd, con
> > if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
> > switch (mode & S_IFMT) {
> > case 0: case S_IFREG:
> > + error = mnt_want_write(nd.mnt);
> > + if (error)
> > + break;
> > error =
> > vfs_create(nd.dentry->d_inode,dentry,mode,&nd);
> > + mnt_drop_write(nd.mnt);
> > break;
> > case S_IFCHR: case S_IFBLK:
> > + error = mnt_want_write(nd.mnt);
> > + if (error)
> > + break;
> > error = vfs_mknod(nd.dentry->d_inode,dentry,mode,
> > new_decode_dev(dev));
> > + mnt_drop_write(nd.mnt);
> > break;
> > case S_IFIFO: case S_IFSOCK:
> > + error = mnt_want_write(nd.mnt);
> > + if (error)
> > + break;
> > error = vfs_mknod(nd.dentry->d_inode,dentry,mode,0);
> > + mnt_drop_write(nd.mnt);
> > break;
> > case S_IFDIR:
> > error = -EPERM;
>
> Should we just take the calls outside the switch statement?
Yeah, that's much better. I assume we don't care whether we're getting
-EROFS or -EPERM/-EINVAL for the S_IFDIR and default cases?
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
