> Well it's not my call, just seems like a really bad idea to change the > error value. You can't claim full coverage for such testing anyway, it's > one of those things that people will complain about two releases later > saying it broke app foo.
Strange since we've spent years changing error values and getting them right in the past. There are real things to worry about - sysfs, sysfs, sysfs, ... and all the other crap which is continually breaking stuff, not spec compliance corrections that don't break things but move us into compliance with the standard Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
