Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 05:03:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Endian-independent code is slower than wrong-endian code, because of the
necessary conditionals. Thus, you DO NOT WANT this(*).
I'd prefer not to have it either. But a someone (pinhead) was smart
enough not to define an endianess for cramfs from the beginning we're
stuck with it.
I thought cramfs was "always" defined as littleendian?
Either way... I thought the primary discussion was about squashfs.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
