From: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Penalizing heavy dirtiers with 1/8-th the total dirty limit might be rather
excessive on large memory machines. Use sqrt to scale it sub-linearly.

Update the comment while we're there.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

Index: linux/mm/page-writeback.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/page-writeback.c      2008-01-17 19:00:56.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/mm/page-writeback.c   2008-01-18 13:07:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -219,17 +219,21 @@ static inline void task_dirties_fraction
 }
 
 /*
- * scale the dirty limit
+ * Task specific dirty limit:
  *
- * task specific dirty limit:
+ *   dirty -= 8 * sqrt(dirty) * p_{t}
  *
- *   dirty -= (dirty/8) * p_{t}
+ * Penalize tasks that dirty a lot of pages by lowering their dirty limit. This
+ * avoids infrequent dirtiers from getting stuck in this other guys dirty
+ * pages.
+ *
+ * Use a sub-linear function to scale the penalty, we only need a little room.
  */
 static void task_dirty_limit(struct task_struct *tsk, long *pdirty)
 {
        long numerator, denominator;
        long dirty = *pdirty;
-       u64 inv = dirty >> 3;
+       u64 inv = 8*int_sqrt(dirty);
 
        task_dirties_fraction(tsk, &numerator, &denominator);
        inv *= numerator;

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to