Hi, On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 09:22:55 +0100 (GMT), Matthew Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Please could you have the /dev/raw RAW_SETBIND ioctl require > CAP_SYS_ADMIN? That is the _only_ thing which /dev/raw is there for. We already go through the VFS permissions layer in this case --- do we really need another permissions check internally? If you really want such a check, I'll certainly accept patches! --Stephen
- Re: New raw IO patches available for 2.2, 2.3 Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: New raw IO patches available for 2.2, 2.3 Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: New raw IO patches available for 2.2, 2.3 Matthew Kirkwood
