Re: HFS, QNXFS

[Jeff Garzik]

David Weinehall wrote:
> Well, if we're to base the (EXPERIMENTAL) based on that it hasn't been
> rewritten for v2.3.x, several other filesystems should be marked...

There's your answer.

IMHO, even if an fs was bug-free in 2.2.x, lack of testing under the new
2.3.x VFS implies an experimental and possibly non-working nature.

        Jeff




-- 
Custom driver development       |    Never worry about theory as long
Open source programming         |    as the machinery does what it's
                                |    supposed to do.  -- R. A. Heinlein