On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Hans Reiser wrote: > place in fs/buffer.c > > #ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS > #include reiserfs/buffer.c > #endif > > If the user doesn't turn reiserfs on, he will take no risk at all. > I'll modify our reiserfs patch to do it that way, it should have been > done..... no, this just makes the kernel harder to maintain and is a generic PITA. Either something is generic and we want to include it in the main kernel, or something is local to an fs and as such it should stay there. We cant have it both ways. -- mingo
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch against kernel 2.3.28 David Weinehall
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch against kernel 2.3.28 Ulrik De Bie
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch against kernel 2.3.28 Heinz Mauelshagen
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch against kernel 2.3.28 Christopher Horn
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch against kernel 2.3.... Alan Cox
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch against kernel ... Hans Reiser
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch against ke... Alan Cox
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch agains... Hans Reiser
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch agains... Alan Cox
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch agains... Hans Reiser
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch agains... Ingo Molnar
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch against ke... Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch agains... Alan Cox
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch agains... Hans Reiser
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch agains... Hans Reiser
- Re: Announce: LVM Patch against kernel 2.3.... Hans Reiser