On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I completly agree with you that the suid hardlink issue is not a good > point for the above issues. Doing >suid is the right thing to do. > > But for the quota forbidding the hardlink in such case is a good point > IMHO. Same mechanism. If I see that foo is nearing the quota I can nohup the _small_ program that will run through foo's directories every hour and open everything new. If I'll be in really nasty mood I'll send it to myself through AF_UNIX socketpair and come out clean on fuser (and avoid running afoul of descriptor limits). Heavy LART and nearly undetectable one - fuser comes empty, process doesn't stand out in top or ps output, no extra links, no nothing. And quota running down.
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Alexander Viro
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Alexander Viro
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs... Pavel Machek
- Re: Can't hardlink in different ... Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: Can't hardlink in different ... Horst von Brand
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Alexander Viro
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#8... Peter J. Braam
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (B... Alexander Viro
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Can't hardlink in different ... Alexander Viro
- Re: Can't hardlink in diffe... Peter J. Braam
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Richard Gooch
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... David Woodhouse
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Richard Gooch
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Richard Gooch
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Richard Gooch
- Re: Can't hardlink in d... Andrea Arcangeli
