In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Garzik writes: > [...] > To sum, documenting changes is a very good idea, notifying specific > hackers of specific kernel changes is a waste of time [unless they > are the maintainers of the code being changed, of course]. I agree that notifying individuals doesn't scale. Notifying the list as a whole, does. > Jeff Erez.
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal po... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal po... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal ports for ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal ports for 2.3? Hans Reiser
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal ports for 2.3? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal ports for ... Hans Reiser
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal ports ... Jeff Garzik
- [OT] Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journ... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal po... Erez Zadok
- kernel change logs (was Re: (reiserfs)... Jeff Garzik
- Re: kernel change logs (was Re: (reise... Erez Zadok
- Re: kernel change logs (was Re: (reise... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal po... Hans Reiser
- Re: RFC: Re: journal ports for 2.3? Andrea Arcangeli
