Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount...

[Tigran Aivazian]

On Mon, 15 May 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > However, looks like you found a VFS bug that breaks ramfs - let's fix that
> > one
> > first..
> 
> I'm not that sure that VFS is at fault here - "you can't umount it, it's
> not empty" sounds _very_ bogus.

well, it sounded bogus intuitively but Linus did explain that it is a
sensible policy for a ramfs filesystem. Are you saying that such policy
cannot be implemented or that tha ramfs' trick of "extra" dget() is
inadequate way of implementing it?

Regards,
Tigran