Hi, On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 03:19:46PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > Erm? Consider that: huge lseek() + write past the end of file. Woops - got > to unmerge the tail (it's an internal block now) and we've got no > knowledge of IO going on the page. Again, IO may be asynchronous - no > protection from i_sem for us. After that page becomes a regular one, > right? Looks like a change of state to me... Naturally, and that change of state must be made atomically by the filesystem. Cheers, Stephen
- Tailmerging for Ext2 Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Alexander Viro
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Alexander Viro
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Alexander Viro
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Alexander Viro
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Hans Reiser
- Documenting VFS, the next... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Documenting VFS, the ... Malcolm Beattie
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Alexander Viro
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Tailmerging for Ext2 Alexander Viro