On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:59:06 +0000 Ed W <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17/03/2011 17:52, Andres Salomon wrote: > > OLPC stuff lives in arch/x86/platform/olpc; if there was more > > alix-specific stuff, I'd suggest moving it into something similar. > > However, I didn't find any. Maybe an arch/x86/platform/geode as a > > place to collect platform drivers for the various geode-based > > machines out there (alix, soekris, etc)? Though honestly, I'm not > > that interested in doing the work to migrate stuff over to there. > > > As this is my first stab at this, I think you are agreeing that the > current change is ok as a first step at least? (I can have a go at a > larger code re-org later...) Yes. > > Can I get your final opinion on what should be in the code Copyright > statement before I resubmit with the module_init change? To recap I > don't want to alienate anyone, but the code is now based on a) > leds-5501 and b) a patch from someone not currently credited in the > file copyright statement? I have stated this origin in the commit > log and noted the derivation in the code itself. What to do..? alix_present came from commit ec9a943ce9f6d6a8ea09587b49d29a020c418c76 , which was from Constantin. As such, it's probably not a good idea to remove the copyright notice. _______________________________________________ Linux-geode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-geode
