On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Aaron Sierra <asie...@xes-inc.com> wrote:
>> - return (data >> 16) & (1 << nr) ? 1 : 0; >> + return !!((data >> 16) & (1 << nr)); > > Linus, > Is this particular change done to simplify verification via Coccinelle? > Otherwise, > this value is already clamped to 0/1. No this was my manual inspection, which isn't very accurate. When in doubt, I made a patch. I'll drop this then, thanks! Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
