On 11/21/2013 10:24 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi Rhyland,
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 04:45:49PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> +static int rfkill_gpio_convert_to_desc(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> + struct rfkill_gpio_data *rfkill)
>> +{
>> + struct rfkill_gpio_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->reset_gpio)) {
>> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, pdata->reset_gpio,
>> + 0, rfkill->reset_name);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_warn("%s: failed to get reset gpio.\n", __func__);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + rfkill->reset_gpio = gpio_to_desc(pdata->reset_gpio);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->shutdown_gpio)) {
>> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, pdata->shutdown_gpio,
>> + 0, rfkill->shutdown_name);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_warn("%s: failed to get shutdown gpio.\n", __func__);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + rfkill->shutdown_gpio = gpio_to_desc(pdata->shutdown_gpio);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> We could drop this conversion if you guys added gpiod_lookup table to
> your platform code. I think something like this is enough. Please note
> that I have not even tried compile it but you get the idea from it.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c
> index 06f0240..19bce88 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c
> @@ -18,13 +18,12 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> #include <linux/rfkill-gpio.h>
> #include "board.h"
>
> static struct rfkill_gpio_platform_data wifi_rfkill_platform_data = {
> .name = "wifi_rfkill",
> - .reset_gpio = 25, /* PD1 */
> - .shutdown_gpio = 85, /* PK5 */
> .type = RFKILL_TYPE_WLAN,
> };
>
> @@ -36,7 +35,13 @@ static struct platform_device wifi_rfkill_device = {
> },
> };
>
> +static struct gpiod_lookup wifi_gpio_lookup[] = {
> + GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("tegra-gpio", 25, "rfkill_gpio", NULL, 0, NULL),
> + GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("tegra-gpio", 85, "rfkill_gpio", NULL, 1, NULL),
> +};
> +
> void __init tegra_paz00_wifikill_init(void)
> {
> + gpiod_add_table(wifi_lookup, ARRAY_SIZE(wifi_gpio_lookup));
> platform_device_register(&wifi_rfkill_device);
> }
>
>
This seems like a reasonable patch, and likely a good way to go. I don't
have a AC100 to test this with though, so I can't verify this
personally. Also, would the paz00 patch become a dependency of this
patchset? Mika, maybe you can therefore include a patch for paz00 in
your patchset?
-rhyland
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
