Hi,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 06:37:35PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Heikki Krogerus
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > index 4e10b10..2f0305e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > @@ -2434,10 +2434,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check
> > gpiod_get_index(struct device *dev,
> > desc = gpiod_find(dev, con_id, idx, &flags);
> > }
> >
> > - if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
> > - dev_warn(dev, "lookup for GPIO %s failed\n", con_id);
> > + if (IS_ERR(desc))
> > return desc;
> > - }
> >
> > status = gpiod_request(desc, con_id);
>
> I kind of agree with the logic that motivates this patch, but how
> about turning this warning into dev_dbg() instead so that people who
> wish so can still continue using it?
Sure, I'll send v2 of this and do just that.
Thanks,
--
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
