2014-04-23 14:53 GMT-07:00 Linus Walleij <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Axel Lin <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2014-04-23 21:25 GMT+08:00 Linus Walleij <[email protected]>: > >>> -#define RDC321X_MAX_GPIO 58 >>> +#define RDC321X_MAX_GPIO 59 >> Hi Linus, >> >> I'm wondering if it is better to define RDC321X_NUM_GPIO (59) rather >> than RDC321X_MAX_GPIO. >> How do you think? > > I think yes. It's not a maximum really is it? It's the number available, > they just mean the max enumerator you can use :-P
Yes, NUM_GPIO is probably a better name for this, and it turns out to also be the maximum for that particular GPIO chip, then it's all good. -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
