RE: [PATCH 2/3] GPIO: gpio-dwapb: Support Debounce

[Chen, Alvin]

> >
> > I don't understand the reason for adding dwapb_read and dwapb_write here.
> > The rest of the driver is using readl and writel.  I'd rather not see
> > two different methods being used in the same driver for register access.
> > Maybe I'm missing something, but if we need to add dwapb_read/write,
> > then it should be used for all register access.
> 
> Alan, it was my proposal. I rather agree that is better to convert all 
> accesses to
> that.
OK, I will convert all readl&writel to dwapb_read&dwapb_write.