On Monday 22 September 2014 03:18 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Varka Bhadram <[email protected]> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Varka Bhadram <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-ks8695.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ks8695.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ks8695.c
index ba2d2f1..10c7377 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ks8695.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ks8695.c
@@ -276,17 +276,14 @@ static int ks8695_gpio_show(struct seq_file *s, void
*unused)
case IOPC_TM_EDGE:
seq_printf(s, "(Edges)"); break;
}
- }
- else
+ } else
seq_printf(s, "GPIO\t");
According to the kernel code formatting guidelines, this should actually be
} else {
seq_printf(s, "GPIO\t");
}
Ok i will change it . Thanks...
--
Regards,
Varka Bhadram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
