On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:22:49PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > On Thursday 30 October 2014 14:21:36 Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > See: > > > > 9ec36cafe43b of/irq: do irq resolution in platform_get_irq > > > > > > > > I suspect a similar thing could be done for I2C. > > > > > > That could work. We would need to introduce a new i2c_get_irq() function > > > though. Wolfram, would you be fine with that ? > > > > I'd think it will look pretty similar to platform_get_irq, no? That is > > fine with me. > > It would, but as Thierry pointed out it should be possible to hide the > details > in the I2C core. I'll submit a patch shortly.
i2c_device_probe() seems exactly the right place to do this. It's in fact the equivalent of what I had proposed in my original patch series where this was done in platform_drv_probe(). Thierry
pgp3HspaWDysm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
