Hi Geert,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tuesday 10 March 2015 12:06:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> All other loops over sh_pfc_soc_info.data_regs[] use
> pinmux_data_reg.regwidth as the sentinel, which is safer as zero is
> never a valid regwidth value (reg could be zero if we start using it to
> store an offset).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>

> ---
> v2:
>   - New.
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c
> index aa2fc77a1925e839..5d3a35ce09125a45 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static void gpio_setup_data_reg(struct sh_pfc_chip *chip,
> unsigned idx) unsigned int bit;
>       unsigned int i;
> 
> -     for (i = 0, dreg = pfc->info->data_regs; dreg->reg; ++i, ++dreg) {
> +     for (i = 0, dreg = pfc->info->data_regs; dreg->reg_width; ++i, ++dreg) {
>               for (bit = 0; bit < dreg->reg_width; bit++) {
>                       if (dreg->enum_ids[bit] == pin->enum_id) {
>                               gpio_pin->dreg = i;

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to