On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 09/03/2015 17:14, Linus Walleij a écrit : >> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Boris Brezillon >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The gpiochip_lock_as_irq call can fail and return an error, while the >>> irq_startup is not expected to fail (returns an unsigned int which is not >>> checked by irq core code). >>> >>> irq_request/release_resources functions have been created to address this >>> problem. >>> >>> Move gpiochip_lock/unlock_as_irq calls into >>> irq_request/release_resources functions to prevent using a gpio as an irq >>> if the gpiochip_lock_as_irq call failed. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]> >> >> Patch applied with all the ACKs. > > Hi Linus, > > As suggested earlier, do you think it can be scheduled for the 4.0-rc > phase as a "fix"?
OK argh had to rebase my tree to get the patch out of the devel branch but what can I do. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
