Patch 4de60970abf9f49737f51ec6e7a1e3bcf6d36742 introduced this code.
Either the type is wrong, or the test should not be performed.
Considering the return type of acpi_gpiochip_pin_to_gpio_offset and
the fact it can return -EINVAL, I would say it is the former.

Qipeng, can you post a fix if you agree with my analysis, giving David
credit with the Reported-by tag?

Thanks!

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 7:27 PM, David Binderman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> [linux-4.0-rc7/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:559]: (style) Checking if unsigned 
> variable 'pin' is less than zero.
>
>         if (pin < 0) {
>
> but
>
>       unsigned pin = agpio->pin_table[i];
>
> Regards
>
> David Binderman
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to