* Jun Nie <[email protected]> [150623 02:56]:
> 2015-06-17 15:17 GMT+08:00 Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>:
> > * Jun Nie <[email protected]> [150616 18:58]:
> >> +             if (pcs->bits_per_mux) {
> >> +                     int pin_pos, byte_num, num_pins_in_register;
> >> +
> >> +                     num_pins_in_register = pcs->width / 
> >> pcs->bits_per_pin;
> >> +                     byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE;
> >> +                     offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes;
> >> +                     pin_pos = pin % num_pins_in_register;
> >> +                     pin_pos *= pcs->bits_per_pin;
> >> +                     data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset) &
> >> +                             ~(pcs->fmask << pin_pos);
> >
> > Should you check the pcs->fmask here too in case some bits are reserved?
> >
> Did not catch your idea? Those bits set in fmask are dedicated for one
> pin mux control and should be clear before set as desired value per my
> understanding. Do you mean some bits may be reserved and not for any
> function?

Right, can you please check that we don't try to write to reserved
bits in the hardawre if the mask is set?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to