Hi Geert,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tuesday 30 June 2015 09:45:25 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> gpio_chip.free() is optional, and can just be left unimplemented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>

> ---
> Untested due to lack of hardware (used on sh only).
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c
> index 1be118e4865fd3f8..b8929b5e2fa26c53 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c
> @@ -286,17 +286,12 @@ static int gpio_function_request(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> unsigned offset) return ret;
>  }
> 
> -static void gpio_function_free(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
> -{
> -}
> -
>  static int gpio_function_setup(struct sh_pfc_chip *chip)
>  {
>       struct sh_pfc *pfc = chip->pfc;
>       struct gpio_chip *gc = &chip->gpio_chip;
> 
>       gc->request = gpio_function_request;
> -     gc->free = gpio_function_free;
> 
>       gc->label = pfc->info->name;
>       gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to