On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >  static void msm_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> >  {
> > -       int gpio = msm_irq_to_gpio(&msm_gpio.gpio_chip, d->irq);
> > +       int gpio = d->hw_irq;
> 
> Does this build? It was hwirq above, not hw_irq.

Indeed. Updated patch below.

Thanks,

        tglx
---
Subject: gpio/msm-v2: Avoid redundant lookup of irq_data
From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:07:01 +0200

It's pretty silly to do

     irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_data->irq);

because that results in d = irq_data, but goes through a lookup of the
irq_data. Use irq_data directly.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnu...@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang....@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v2.c |   18 +++++-------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: tip/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v2.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v2.c
+++ tip/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v2.c
@@ -187,14 +187,6 @@ static int msm_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_c
        return irq_create_mapping(domain, offset);
 }
 
-static inline int msm_irq_to_gpio(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned irq)
-{
-       struct irq_data *irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
-
-       return irq_data->hwirq;
-}
-
-
 /* For dual-edge interrupts in software, since the hardware has no
  * such support:
  *
@@ -238,7 +230,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_po
 
 static void msm_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-       int gpio = msm_irq_to_gpio(&msm_gpio.gpio_chip, d->irq);
+       int gpio = d->hwirq;
 
        writel(BIT(INTR_STATUS), GPIO_INTR_STATUS(gpio));
        if (test_bit(gpio, msm_gpio.dual_edge_irqs))
@@ -247,8 +239,8 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_
 
 static void msm_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-       int gpio = msm_irq_to_gpio(&msm_gpio.gpio_chip, d->irq);
        unsigned long irq_flags;
+       int gpio = d->hwirq;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&tlmm_lock, irq_flags);
        writel(TARGET_PROC_NONE, GPIO_INTR_CFG_SU(gpio));
@@ -259,8 +251,8 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq
 
 static void msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-       int gpio = msm_irq_to_gpio(&msm_gpio.gpio_chip, d->irq);
        unsigned long irq_flags;
+       int gpio = d->hwirq;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&tlmm_lock, irq_flags);
        __set_bit(gpio, msm_gpio.enabled_irqs);
@@ -271,8 +263,8 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct i
 
 static int msm_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type)
 {
-       int gpio = msm_irq_to_gpio(&msm_gpio.gpio_chip, d->irq);
        unsigned long irq_flags;
+       int gpio = d->hwirq;
        uint32_t bits;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&tlmm_lock, irq_flags);
@@ -331,7 +323,7 @@ static void msm_summary_irq_handler(unsi
 
 static int msm_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
 {
-       int gpio = msm_irq_to_gpio(&msm_gpio.gpio_chip, d->irq);
+       int gpio = d->hwirq;
 
        if (on) {
                if (bitmap_empty(msm_gpio.wake_irqs, MAX_NR_GPIO))

 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to