> On 16 Jul 2015, at 9:52 AM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Michael van der Westhuizen > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In my case, I have quite a lot of vendor-supplied code that needs the >> numbers to >> be stable and backward compatible. This quickly devolves into a discussion >> of >> GPIOs in sysfs as an ABI, which is not a discussion I want to have :) > > That is impossible to avoid. > > What you're saying is you just want to drill a hole in the boat and not > have a discussion whether the boat is going to float after this or > not.
Not at all. I was just noting that this patch will touch on this topic, and it’s not a topic that I would weigh in on as my opinions are irrelevant in this discussion. No incendiary topic intended :-) Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
