Hi Linus,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Where possible I prefer not to apply non-DTS/DTSI patches on top of
>> DTS/DTSI patches, I believe this is in keeping with how the ARM SoC
>> maintainers like things handled. With this in mind I have done the
>> following:
>>
>> 1. Queued up the DTSI patches (patches 1 - 3) for v4.3 in my dt branch.
>> I intend for this to turn up in next soon.
>> 2. Queued up for pinctrl patches (patches 4 - 6) for v4.4 in a pinctrl patch.
>> I intend for these to be present in the renesas devel branch but
>> not in next until after the release of v4.3-rc1. I would also be
>> happy to drop them and let Linus Walleij take these patches for v4.4,
>> assuming patches 1 - 3 are accepted for v4.3.
>
> OK.
>
> Will the world explode if I try to queue the pinctrl patches 4-6 in my
> tree now for v4.3? Then I prefer to defer to v4.4. Else I can merge
> it in parallel?
There won't be a mapping between gpio and pins in any branch having the
pinctrl changes but not the dtsi changes.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
