* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com> [150904 03:04]:
> On 09/03/2015 08:31 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >If gpio-omap probe fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, the GPIO numbering
> >keeps increasing. Only increase the gpio count if gpiochip_add()
> >was successful as otherwise the numbers will increase for each
> >probe attempt.
> >
> >Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com>
> >Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@dowhile0.org>
> >Cc: Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com>
> >Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssant...@kernel.org>
> >Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>
> >---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> >@@ -1095,7 +1095,6 @@ static int omap_gpio_chip_init(struct gpio_bank *bank,
> >struct irq_chip *irqc)
> > } else {
> > bank->chip.label = "gpio";
> > bank->chip.base = gpio;
> >- gpio += bank->width;
> > }
> > bank->chip.ngpio = bank->width;
> >
> >@@ -1105,6 +1104,9 @@ static int omap_gpio_chip_init(struct gpio_bank *bank,
> >struct irq_chip *irqc)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> >+ if (!bank->is_mpuio)
> >+ gpio += bank->width;
> >+
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1
> > /*
> > * REVISIT: Once we have OMAP1 supporting SPARSE_IRQ, we can drop
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com>
>
> With hope that only GPIO0 will be deferred, otherwise
> there will be total mess in gpios enumeration ;)
Heh nope :) If pinctrl currently ever causes deferred probe
things will get totally messed up.. Works fine after $subject
patch.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
