The code in pinctrl-imx.c only works correctly if in the
imx_pinctrl_soc_info passed to imx_pinctrl_probe we have:
info->pins[i].number = i
conf_reg(info->pins[i]) = 4 * i
(which conf_reg(pin) being the offset of the pin's configuration
register).
When the imx25 specific part was introduced in b4a87c9b966f ("pinctrl:
pinctrl-imx: add imx25 pinctrl driver") we had:
info->pins[i].number = i + 1
conf_reg(info->pins[i]) = 4 * i
. Commit 34027ca2bbc6 ("pinctrl: imx25: fix numbering for pins") tried
to fix that but made the situation:
info->pins[i-1].number = i
conf_reg(info->pins[i-1]) = 4 * i
which is hardly better but fixed the error seen back then.
So insert another reserved entry in the array to finally yield:
info->pins[i].number = i
conf_reg(info->pins[i]) = 4 * i
Fixes: 34027ca2bbc6 ("pinctrl: imx25: fix numbering for pins")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
---
Changes since (implicit) v1 sent with Message-Id:
[email protected] :
- fix a formula in the commit log
drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx25.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx25.c
b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx25.c
index faf635654312..293ed4381cc0 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx25.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx25.c
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@
#include "pinctrl-imx.h"
enum imx25_pads {
- MX25_PAD_RESERVE0 = 1,
+ MX25_PAD_RESERVE0 = 0,
+ MX25_PAD_RESERVE1 = 1,
MX25_PAD_A10 = 2,
MX25_PAD_A13 = 3,
MX25_PAD_A14 = 4,
@@ -169,6 +170,7 @@ enum imx25_pads {
/* Pad names for the pinmux subsystem */
static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc imx25_pinctrl_pads[] = {
IMX_PINCTRL_PIN(MX25_PAD_RESERVE0),
+ IMX_PINCTRL_PIN(MX25_PAD_RESERVE1),
IMX_PINCTRL_PIN(MX25_PAD_A10),
IMX_PINCTRL_PIN(MX25_PAD_A13),
IMX_PINCTRL_PIN(MX25_PAD_A14),
--
2.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
