On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Johan Hovold <[email protected]> wrote:
> This looks good (apart from the checkpatch warning for the warning
> message string).
Yeah the GPIO maintainer is liberal about that rule...
> You also need to revert ddd5404007b8 ("gpio-sysfs: Use gpio descriptor
> name instead of gpiochip names array") however as this is an ABI change.
> Otherwise pins with a name in DT will now be exported using the gpio name
> rather than number as they used to be. [ The current behaviour is
> maintained by exporting names from chip->names for hard coded names
> only. ]
I think it is ABI-correct: it uses desc->name if that is set, and
currently that is only set from chip->names[] so status quo.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
