Hi, Linus On 11/17/2015 10:14 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Bamvor Jian Zhang > <bamvor.zhangj...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> There are limitations for the current checker: >> 1. Could not check the overlap if the new gpiochip is the secondly >> gpiochip. >> 2. Could not check the overlap if the new gpiochip is overlap >> with the left of gpiochip. E.g. if we insert [c, d] between >> [a,b] and [e, f], and e >= c + d, it will successful even if >> c < a + b. >> 3. Allow overlap of base of different gpiochip. >> >> This patch fix these issues by checking the overlap of both right and >> left gpiochip in the same loop statement. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangj...@linaro.org> > > Patch applied with some tweaks. Had to rebase it because > I renamed ->dev to ->parent in the GPIO tree, then I found > it possible to get rid of the ret variable altogether. Oh, I am sorry. I notice you parent patch but I worked on your "for-next" branch. I will take care next time.
Thanks your help. Regards Bamvor > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
